Mgr. Josef Picek

* 1938

  • "That was an interesting trip to Italy. There was always some kind of political oversight on the trip back then. It was called the 'peacock eye'. At that time the ideological secretary of the district party committee went as a political supervisor, and everyone was scaring us to watch out for him. Well, in the end, in retrospect, I have to say that it was possible to get along with him. But it was sometimes interesting situations. The programme was made by Italians and we had the help of a former Czech emigrant living in Milan. It started with the director of the Cultural House at that time, when my wife was discussing the programme of the tour with him, asking who we were with, and she said that she would rather not tell him, that she didn't think it was that important. That was the first conflict, but it still sort of passed. The director came with us and then the ideologist. For example, we had a performance there at ten o'clock in the morning on the shores of Lago di Como. So we got there and we found out that it was a singing during the mass and then another concert for about half an hour in that church after the mass. This comrade from the district party committee came to me and said, 'Comrade, what are we going to do?' And I say to him, 'Well, that’s a tough situation.' Because I've been here in Italy on previous tours, and I've experienced a reception that took place in a rectory and we were served by nuns. But the whole city council was there, and they were all communists, so the communists get along very well with the Catholics here, and if we had refused to sing in that church, it would certainly have spread the word here that we don't have religious freedom. And in doing so we would have damaged the cause of the Italian Communists.' And he said, 'You're right, sing!' And he ran away with the director of the House of Culture. They were sitting there on the pier about 80 meters away from us, on the shore. The parish priest invited us to Campari on the terrace. And they sat with their backs to us, as if they didn't belong to us, they’d rather forgo the Campari than risk someone taking a picture of them with the priest. So, sometimes the situations were really not easy, but in their own way, quite amusing."

  • "It was a question of the personal bravery of the people who did or did not stand up for someone. I sometimes feel sorry when these people are forgotten. And when totalitarian times are turned into a monolith of mud. For example, when I read in the newspapers that Jaroslav Seifert was not allowed to publish at all. That's not true at all. First, he published individual collections, and then he even published collected writings. It was always a question of the editor in question having the courage and strength to stand up for the work and somehow push it through. It didn't always succeed, but very often it did. So the era was far from monolithic, it was quite very complicated and somehow things of real value could be pushed through."

  • "Václav Rabas was appointed director of the newly established conservatory as a kind of political guarantee, because I think he was already a member of the Federal Assembly at the time. Václav was a very complex personality. I personally have rather good memories of him, because he - as soon as the school was founded, he took me in. Even though at that time, for political reasons, I couldn't have a normal audition. So he took me on part-time - I tutored part-time and I taught part-time at this newly established school. And after a year, I went for a normal audition and became a regular teacher. And I can say that I was not the only one who was a political troublemaker at this school. And not only were they at this school, but they even held leadership positions there. Vaclav Rabas made me head of the Music Theory Department at that time. The head of the Wind Department was Ota Tvrdý, who also had some big political problems from Prague. The head of the String Department was Ivan Štraus, who, after he divorced the woman he married in Russia, was not at all well politically. And with a squad like that, he just built the conservatory. Miroslav Raichl came there a little later. He was another screw-up. We knew each other very well, because I went to the Zdeněk Nejedlý University Art Ensemble at the University of Economics when I was studying at the University of Education, and Slávek Neumann and Mirek Raichl were in charge there at that time. And Mirek Raichl at that time, in that year, in the sixty-eight, even worked on the Central Committee of the Party, which was the worst political qualification he could have developed, but he was just an enthusiast. He wanted to build something positive. He was never a communist in the true sense of the word, but he was a very positive person for many years. Then it broke him down a little bit - after August [1968] and after that incipient normalization, he was basically almost liquidated, he wasn't allowed to play at all. The only thing that kept him going were the children's choirs that sang it."

  • "But the interesting thing was that shortly after I won the competition I was forbidden by order of the head of the regional committee to perform in public, so I requested an audience with him. And I brought him the reviews that I had from the competition and I said, 'How does that compare to being banned from performing?' Because at that time, the circumstances were really very unpleasant in that the only way to give public concerts was through an agency, and there were a lot of other considerations besides the performance itself. And if it was some kind of a composed show, you had to make a direct play for that show. I will not forget how we did a programme with Radek Bartoník, an actor from the Hradec Králové theatre, from the poems of Josef Kainar, it was from the collection "Lazarus and the Song", which is such a harsh poetry. And the committee didn't like it, but Kainar was the president of the Writers' Union at the time. So it was a bit of a dance between the eggs on their part, and they finally allowed it, but it was obvious that they were very reluctant. It really depended on who liked and didn't like what. And it also depended on whether one had personal enemies. Which I didn't. Many of my colleagues, for example, from the radio station - they had to go to the shovel because they were not qualified and they had enemies. And if in the 1960s I was not aware of and did not admit any political limitations at all, then from 1970 onwards I was aware of them very harshly."

  • "We got in the car and took the shortest way home. And I immediately got on the radio, and then I didn't come home for 14 days. I worked and we slept on the ground and it was very adventurous. It was organized, so we had several workplaces around the city in Hradec and I was still in the recording studio with a few colleagues and outside collaborators from the theater. That was in the Old Town, it doesn't exist anymore, and we were patched through there, we had on-air input. It was a tremendous school, because we were talking without any preparation and going around town recording interviews with people. We watched what was going on. and we were trying to keep it going somehow. We were the longest-running radio studio, and that was because we were staffed by Poles, Hradec Kralove. And they sabotaged it somewhat. I wasn't there, but I heard a story that there was a tank that drove up to the main building, in front of the studio headquarters. A Polish major got out there and wanted the director to give it to him. And he told him if he had a certificate from the central director. The Pole said he didn't. The director told him he had nothing to hand over, so he refused. The Pole saluted and left."

  • Celé nahrávky
  • 1

    Pardubice, 13.05.2021

    (audio)
    délka: 01:16:13
    nahrávka pořízena v rámci projektu Příběhy regionu - HRK REG ED
Celé nahrávky jsou k dispozici pouze pro přihlášené uživatele.

People who helped ‚non-regime‘ artists during totalitarianism are forgotten

Josef Picek in 2021
Josef Picek in 2021
zdroj: Pardubice

Josef Picek was born on 24 December 1938 in Podlažice. His parents worked as teachers. Mum taught Czech and history, dad taught mathematics, physics and chemistry. The whole family lived in a small apartment without water and electricity. He remembers how during the war years Germans, Russian Liberation Army and Red Army soldiers lived in their house. After the war, he started going to a boys‘ school in Chrast near Chrudim. Soon he started playing the piano and his first teacher was Sister Cecilia in the convent in Chrast. He graduated from the chemical industry, but he was still learning to play the piano. He took private lessons with Professor František Rauch at the Academy of Performing Arts in Prague. After graduation he studied at the Faculty of Education of Charles University, majoring in Czech language - music education. He spent 1968 at the Czechoslovak Radio in Hradec Králové as a music editor and director. The Hradec studio was significantly involved in the anti-occupation broadcasts of Czechoslovak Radio in the days of August 1968. He had to leave radio during the normalisation period and after a short stint at the Vítězný únor theatre in Hradec Králové he had trouble finding employment. He then began teaching at the Folk School of Arts in Jičín. Eventually he managed to get into the conservatory in Prague, directly into the fourth year. In the fifth year he won the first competitive show of Czechoslovak conservatories in piano playing. In 1978 he began teaching at the newly founded music conservatory in Pardubice. He then graduated from the Academy of Performing Arts under Professor Zdeněk Jílek. In 1989 he was a spokesman for the Civic Forum of the Pardubice Conservatory. He also worked as a choirmaster of the choirs Vokální harmonie and Harmonia Nova. He composed incidental music for the East Bohemian Theatre in Pardubice and of course also performed as a solo pianist or in various chamber groups. He was also a sought-after accompanist. In 2021 he was living in Pardubice and still devoted to music.