M.Eng. Ján Benček

“I was twice at the remand centre. At first I was called to come because of my state citizenship to the national municipal government, I was invited to this new building. I didn’t understand why I was supposed to go there, but when I arrived, I showed them the summons. Then one man called me into another big room, where was only a big table, two chairs, him and I. He seemed to be very stiff-necked and when he asked me if I knew where I was, I said: ‘Well, you called me to come here, but according to this picture, it is…’ And this was time when he began to ask me: ‘How is it possible that you are not in jail yet?’ I didn’t understand why…” Interviewer: “So, why were you supposed to be in jail? What did they blame you for?” Ján Benček: “Well, they accused me of my activity within the catholic action and they also knew I was working with youth in Svoradov.”

“So in the first place there were these three renegades. Back then I was an assistant at the university and there I led some study groups. So these three guys what did the first was that they reported on me. So because of that I wasn’t allowed to lengthen my assisting internship anymore and I found myself without a job. However, there was also another intervention too; as they (the communists) found out I led a catholic action, that’s how they called it. And as a result of that I was expelled from school.”

“He told me to come in a month again, hoping I would think it all through again. So precisely one month later in the morning I went to the life confession and prepared in this way anything could happen; I was ready. I said goodbye to my wife thinking I would stay at the station. I waited there for some time hearing how the investigator yelled at somebody: ‘How come you didn’t hear that? What do you listen then, what do you do?’ I was thinking this was about to happen if I had signed it… I was aware of that. And as I was sitting in the hall he came to me and said: ‘What’s the matter?’ I answered: ‘Nothing, you told me to come here.’ ‘Go home!’ And I didn’t know what they knew about me or what they didn’t, but I never encountered something like this anymore. And the second time I was at the interrogation as a witness. This was a little different. I was there with my friend, who is now in Vienna. They detained us both. He was being investigated in one room and I was in the second one. And the investigator was coming back and forth and informing us about what the other one said. They didn’t confront us; we didn’t know about each other, that we were both investigated at the same time. But, thanks God, it wasn’t that harsh. They wanted to know which priests work with youth. Luckily, we had such good attributes that we didn’t know the names of people who we used to meet. They asked me: ‘Do you know father Janovský? ’ and in all good conscience I could say that I never heard that name. Within our community, we called him ‘Maco’, so I never heard what his surname was. The same thing they asked me about another priest to confirm that name. I don’t know if he did it on purpose or not, but I had to answer again that I didn’t know him. So when they read my testimony, they told me: ‘Your testimony was the best!’ because I said: ‘Well, if I knew those names, I would tell you.’ So these were the two cases of my detention.”

„My professor was very tolerant and we got along very well, we respected each other. He left to Brno to one world-famous professor Vinš, who had a private office there and so I went to work to Brno as well. Later on, professor Vinš was invited to lecture at the University of Technology in Bratislava and when he started working there, he was glad to have me with him. I worked as his assistant. But these three young men who were in my study group couldn’t stand it, so they simply reported me. I received a paper that I shall be expelled to manual work, at first to a brickfield and then it changed. I went to work at the production of building components to Sučany. In Sučany I worked as a manual worker, although my boss, who was just a laic, saw, that I understood these things and so they let me work in a laboratory, to help. And there my situation changed completely. In the end I was the only specialist there and when the Slovak-wide enterprise was built in Bratislava, they called me to come and work there at the Technology Department. I was being interviewed by the so-called technicians, who weren’t able to answer my expert questions. They all knew each other there, they were all communists who behaved informally, but suddenly they began to call me Mr. Engineer.”

“Most of all I was personally in touch with Neuwirth. We were the same grade although he was two classes ahead of me. I met him immediately as he was released from the prison. He was really emaciated, poorly looking. Then we very closely cooperated within the KDH (Christian Democratic Party). I was also with him when he was an ambassador in Paris. He invited me to come and visit him there for a week on his expenses.” Interviewer: “Did he lead any meetings or what did he organize?” Ján Benček: “Well, he precisely took care of medical students. He was a doctor and his brother-in-law was back then, I would say, such an organizer of all the students’ life and events. Anton Neuwirth was a medico and his brother-in-law was named Stercula, Vladimír Stercula. He was an excellent selfless doctor who was set as a great example in newspapers, e.g. of how he, driving a horse, saved ill people in Kysuce region. He didn’t need any means, anything. It was just later when they found out about him being the one from Kolakovič’s family and the future brother-in-law of this Neuwirth.”